A PYMNTS Company

US: Qualcomm hits at FTC over ‘deficient’ antitrust suit

 |  June 4, 2017

Late Friday night, Qualcomm fired the latest salvo in the case, filing documents in which it says, for a second time, that the FTC’s suit should be dismissed because it doesn’t back up the agency’s claims that Qualcomm’s practices hampered competition.

The FTC filed its suit in January, saying Qualcomm imposed “onerous” supply and patent-licensing terms to extract high royalties from cell phone manufacturers and weaken rivals. In April, Qualcomm responded, saying the case didn’t hold water and should be dismissed. That prompted the FTC to file papers last month defending its suit and saying the case should go forward. And that’s what brought on Friday’s filing.

“We note in our reply brief…that the FTC cannot and has not adequately defended its defective complaint,” Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel for Qualcomm, said in a statement. “The complaint lacks necessary facts and fails to plead a coherent theory of competitive harm. Improperly adding alleged ‘facts’ supplied by competitors’ briefs cannot prop up a deficient complaint.” Qualcomm rivals Samsung and Intel had earlier filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of the FTC’s case.

The lawsuit continues a pattern of antitrust scrutiny directed at Qualcomm in recent years. In December, the South Korean Fair Trade Commission hit the chipset maker with an $850 million fine for maintaining an “unfair business model” and creating a monopoly with its practices. In February, China fined Qualcomm almost $1 billion as part of a long-running antimonopoly investigation into the company.

Full Content: Phone Arena

Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.

EU to Proceed with Tech Fines Despite US Tariff Pause EU to Proceed with Tech Fines Despite US Tariff Pause

EU to Proceed with Tech Fines Despite US Tariff Pause

 |  April 9, 2025

Brussels appears poised to impose steep penalties on major U.S. tech firms, including Meta and Apple, even as former President Donald Trump temporarily halts a planned trade clash with the European Union, according to the New York Post.

Sources familiar with the matter told the New York Post that the European Commission may announce fines against Meta and Apple in the coming days for alleged violations of antitrust laws, though the exact timing remains uncertain and could shift based on ongoing developments.

This comes shortly after Trump unexpectedly announced a 90-day suspension on the imposition of his “reciprocal tariffs,” which would have added a 20% duty on all EU exports to the United States. The delay, confirmed by White House insiders, was intended to de-escalate transatlantic tensions and open the door for further trade discussions.

However, EU regulators appear determined to press ahead with enforcement under the bloc’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which was designed to rein in anti-competitive practices by dominant digital platforms. One senior EU official told the New York Post that the tech fines are being handled as an entirely separate issue from trade negotiations with Washington.

“This legal assessment and tariffs are two completely separate processes,” a source close to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told the Post, signaling that the Commission is unlikely to soften its regulatory stance in exchange for trade concessions.

According to the New York Post, Meta could face penalties reaching hundreds of millions of dollars—or even exceeding $1 billion—over its business practices. While Apple is also in the Commission’s crosshairs, the size of its potential fine is less certain, with sources indicating it could be more modest as Brussels balances enforcement with diplomatic sensitivity.

Related: EU Nears Ruling on Apple and Meta Over Alleged Tech Rule Breaches

The Commission is also expected to issue Meta a formal cease-and-desist order, outlining the specific actions the company must take to comply with EU regulations, per the New York Post.

Despite pressure from the U.S. side, European officials remain unmoved. One anonymous EU official noted that enforcement of the DMA will proceed regardless of political developments in Washington. “The DMA is a law that’s in place, and we need to enforce it. We have it to protect our consumers, and it applies to all companies,” the official emphasized.

Tensions over the issue have also been inflamed by criticism from former White House trade advisor Peter Navarro, who, in an op-ed for the Financial Times, accused the EU of engaging in “lawfare” to unfairly target American firms. He claimed the bloc’s regulatory tactics were even more damaging than tariffs.

At a Capitol Hill hearing, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer echoed those concerns, asserting that the United States would not allow foreign jurisdictions to unilaterally shape the global rules for digital commerce.

While President von der Leyen has reportedly considered using tech enforcement as a potential countermeasure against U.S. trade pressure, other European lawmakers insist that regulatory decisions must remain independent of geopolitical maneuvering.

Meanwhile, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly been appealing to the White House for assistance, hoping to either reduce the fines or eliminate them altogether, according to New York Post sources.

Source: The New York Post