“What we are going to analyze is qualify whether the buyer can be eligible, that it is independent of the parties, and that there is no problem in terms of competition with the buyer. If it turns out that it is someone who has a lot of market participation and is going to generate another problem, clearly we would not authorize it,” Contreras said.
He added that the objective of the IFT is to preserve competition, and therefore, both ESPN and Fox Sports will remain competitors, because that is why they were prevented from concentrating on a single player.
Last Monday the regulator approved the merger agreement between the companies, valued at US$71 billion dollars, under the condition that they sell the channels and programming rights of Fox Sports in Mexico, in a similar decision to those taken in other countries such as Brazil or Chile.
Full Content: El Financiero
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI