Making Sense Out of the Global Approach of Competition Governance – An Analysis from Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches
Posted by Social Science Research Network
Kim Them Do (United Nations)
Abstract: This paper focuses on making sense out of the global approach of competition governance; it is based on the rationalist and constructivist literature of international relations theory.
The rationalist argument explains its potential benefits by focusing on sovereignty and transaction costs, while the constructivist view highlights the shared perception of the common value of the consumer welfare objective, competition culture, and the contributory role of the global regulatory networks in the norm development process.
It suggests that both perspectives may be useful in identifying and describing explanatory factors in the case study. These explanations are not mutually exclusive, and could open up a new diplomacy initiative.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI