The extent to which merchants pass along savings on interchange to consumers in the form of price reductions or other benefits proved to be a central issue on this panel, along with the distinction between regulatory goals and competition perspective on interchange fees.
Abel Mateus focused on the waterbed effect and concluded that consumers would end up paying more money in many European countries as the higher fees charged by banks would not be counterbalanced by price reductions from merchants.
Marianne Verdier noted that there was too much emphasis on price effects and concentrated on the impact on non-price dimensions of competition such as fraud risk and improvements in quality.
Finally, Frank Maier-Rigaud examined the different methods of regulating interchange fees in the context of the Commission’s case against MasterCard.
View the panel discussion here.
Featured News
Senator Warner Calls for Treasury Oversight on Big Tech Sanctions
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Industry Minister Targets Grocery Giants with Antitrust Changes
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
DOT Issues Provisional Ruling Ending Delta-Aeroméxico Partnership
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
US Targets China with Proposed Rules on Cloud Giants in AI Development
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Australia’s ACCC Finds Limited Evidence of Profiteering in Childcare Sector Despite Soaring Fees
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI