Chile’s Free Competition Defense Tribunal (TDLC) has decided to reject the requests for a delay in investigations requested by supermarket chains Cencosud and SMU, as they seek more time to comply with the investigating agency’s information requests regarding their involvement in a price-fixing deal.
The Tribunal pointed out that the arguments presented by the National Economic Prosecutors, the main competition investigating authority, had been “sufficiently clear” and free of contradictions, as had been claimed by SMU’s request.
The TDLC further clarified that the investigations into the case cover a period between 2008 and 2011, “meaning this Tribunal will only be able to sanction any anticompetitive conducts detected to have taken place” during this period, as said by the regulator’s Presiding Minister, Judge Tomás Menchaca.
Full content: Capital > http://www.capital.cl/poder/2016/03/11/090312-tdlc-rechaza-dilatorias-solicitadas-por-cencosud-y-smu
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Pushes Review of CoStar’s Commercial Real Estate Antitrust Case
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
UK’s CMA Investigates Ardonagh’s Atlanta Group and Markerstudy Merger
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Greenberg Traurig Grow Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €10 Million for Privacy Violations
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates AI Competition, Eyes Microsoft’s OpenAI Deal: Bloomberg
Jan 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Rule(s) of Reason
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
Evolving the Rule of Reason for Legacy Business Conduct
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Object Identity
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
In Praise of Rules-Based Antitrust
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI
The Future of State AG Antitrust Enforcement and Federal-State Cooperation
Jan 29, 2024 by
CPI