Winter 2015, Volume 3, Number 1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edce3/edce30b0728c10c1df6c560f755ad4ec49ed2db5" alt="Antitrust Chronicle ANTITRUST & IP – OLD FRANDS, NEW CHALLENGES March 2015 I Antitrust Chronicle ANTITRUST & IP – OLD FRANDS, NEW CHALLENGES March 2015 I"
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust & IP - Old Frands, New Challenges (Part 1)
While on a certain level, antitrust and patent laws share the ethos of fostering innovation and checking anti-competitive conduct, they also differ in their methods – in that patents effectively create legally recognized monopolies and are a well-accepted exception to antitrust regulation. Standard essential patent (“SEP”) licensing (where the SEP holders agree to license their products on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms in lieu of adoption of their technology standards) is an issue that rests at the intersection antitrust laws and patent laws. Standard-setting in the U.S. is sectoral and market-led, while in certain countries it is state-led / influenced – which may place SEP licensing issues at the crossroads of law and international diplomacy, adding another layer of complexity.