A PYMNTS Company

Canada’s Watchdog Looks Into OpenAI Over Privacy Concerns

 |  May 25, 2023

Canadian privacy regulators are initiating a collaborative inquiry into the data collection and usage practices of OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, as they join other major governments in examining the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

The federal privacy regulator, along with counterparts in Quebec, British Columbia, and Alberta, will conduct an investigation to determine if OpenAI has obtained proper consent for collecting, using, and disclosing personal information of residents through ChatGPT, as reported by Reuters.

Read more: OpenAI CEO Says It May Leave The EU Over Regulations

The emergence of ChatGPT, a popular chatbot, has sparked competition between tech companies including Alphabet Inc and Meta, leading governments to consider regulations for the use of AI technology.

ChatGPT is capable of producing written works, including articles, essays, jokes, and poetry based on prompts. OpenAI, a privately owned entity supported by Microsoft, released it to the general public at no cost in late November.

Canada’s probe will also look into whether the company has respected “its obligations with respect to openness and transparency, access, accuracy and accountability”.

“As this is an active investigation, no additional details are available,” the commissioner’s office said, adding that the findings of the investigation would be reported publicly.

Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple

Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple

 |  December 22, 2024

In a significant development in the ongoing antitrust battle against Apple, a federal judge in New Jersey has designated six law firms to represent millions of consumers alleging that the tech giant has monopolized the smartphone market. The appointments were made by U.S. District Judge Julien Xavier Neals, who named Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, Girard Sharp, Seeger Weiss, Carella Byrne Cecchi Brody & Agnello, Susman Godfrey, and Hausfeld as lead counsel, according to Reuters.

The decision resolves a competition among the firms for leadership in the case, which represents iPhone purchasers directly affected by Apple’s alleged monopolistic practices. The appointed firms stand to earn substantial legal fees should they secure a favorable settlement or judgment against the company.

Per Reuters, the claims brought forward by consumers align with a March lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department. Both suits contend that Apple has implemented measures to restrict consumer choice in the mobile device market and for associated services such as digital wallets and messaging platforms. Apple has denied the allegations and did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Read more: Japan Adopts Ordinance to Regulate Tech Giants Apple and Google

Legal Teams with Proven Track Records

The law firms selected to lead the case have achieved significant victories in high-profile antitrust and consumer protection lawsuits. For instance, Hagens Berman has played a key role in securing a tentative $2.8 billion settlement in lawsuits against the National Collegiate Athletic Association, while Hausfeld was instrumental in obtaining a $2.7 billion settlement in antitrust litigation against Blue Cross Blue Shield. Susman Godfrey, another appointed firm, was co-lead counsel in Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation case against Fox News, which settled for $787 million.

Meanwhile, Apple’s defense team features legal heavyweights from Kirkland & Ellis and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

Broader Legal Landscape

Judge Neals previously appointed a separate group of law firms in October to represent consumers who purchased iPhones through mobile carriers. That legal team includes Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky, Berger Montague, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, and Spector Roseman & Kodroff. Additionally, three other firms—Korein Tillery, MoloLamken, and Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick—will lead a proposed class action representing buyers of Apple Watches, Reuters reported.

Source: Reuters