By: John Bergmayer (Public Knowledge)
The long rivalry between tech giants Oracle and Google came to an end with a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that reinstated the view that Application Software Interfaces (APIs) – a form of software library – was fair use. Here, Google had written code that was indistinguishable in many ways to existing software published by developer Java, which was intended to help developers working on the new Android platform. In this case, Google’s implementation of Java-like APIs in the system allowed developers to make requests for information or actions that the system would easily understand. However, though the new ‘functional’ code may have been totally different from the original Java code, the programmers still have to call things by the same names in order for the program to work.
The Supreme Court correctly judged that this situation was pro-competitive and legitimate, as copyright law and IP protections are not meant to lock developers into specific proprietary platforms or to prevent the entry of new platforms that can be compatible with powerful incumbents…
Featured News
Chamber of Commerce Sues to Overturn FTC Non-Compete Ban
Apr 24, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Chief Warns of Healthcare Price Fixing Risks Amid Tech Advancements
Apr 24, 2024 by
CPI
Amazon’s Investment in Anthropic Faces Antitrust Scrutiny
Apr 24, 2024 by
CPI
Italian Antitrust Authority Fines Amazon €10 Million for Unfair Trade Practices
Apr 24, 2024 by
CPI
Tuta Mail Raises Alarm Over Google Search Ranking Plunge Amidst DMA Rollout
Apr 24, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI